Okay - to restate - this was published after the same media network published articles that misrepresented the Act and people closed their trails.
The Act is about trails, but it is an effort to consolidate other legislation, so that needs to be re-stated. So I didn't say that specifically.
Some comments were made "that Mr Sabourin only reported the trails association information. " Wrong, it was published through a lot of effort to restate facts, and our commentary actually was bringing some balance to redress earlier biases and incorrect information they had published
Our FAQ is actually accurate to the process of easements and breaches.